This message is displayed because client-side scripting is turned off or not supported in the browser you are currently using.
Please turn on client-side scripting or install a browser that supports client-side scripting.

Ontario Government | Ministry of Labour | Site Map | Accessibility | text resize: A A A

Home | About Us | OWT Library | Forms | Practice Directions | Decision Search | Contact Us | Fran├žais

Established in 1985, the Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal (WSIAT) is the final level of appeal to which workers and employers may bring disputes concerning workplace safety and insurance matters in Ontario. WSIAT has always been separate from and independent of the Workplace Safety and Insurance Board.

Questions?

Decisions

Appeal Process

For Representatives

Finding a Representative

Documents & Publications

Legal/Medical Resources

Popular Topics

Links to Other Agencies

Highlights of Noteworthy Decisions

  Decision 2923 17
12/15/2017
K. Iima

  • Available employment (local labour market)

A heavy equipment operator suffered a low back injury in 2008, for which the Board granted the worker a 20% NEL award. The worker appealed a decision of the Appeals Resolution Officer basing LOE benefits on deemed earnings in the SEB of retail sales.
The worker has lived in a remote community of about 1,200 people for about 35 years. His wife has had the same job in the community for 25 years. The closest town has a population of 65,000 and is 110 kilometres away. The closest city is 250 kilometres away.
According to Board policy, a SEB is defined as a category of suitable jobs that are available in the local labour market. The local labour market includes any surrounding area to which the worker might reasonably commute. In determining what is reasonable, factors include pre-injury commuting pattern, travel requirements of the SEB and the extent of functional abilities related to ability to travel.
In this case, the worker spent most of his working life as a heavy equipment operator. He attempted to find work in his local labour market by applying to gas stations and grocery stores, as well as for jobs that were not within the SEB.
The Vice-Chair found that the worker did not have a reasonable prospect of obtaining suitable employment in the local labour market. Considering that the SEB was for a direct entry occupation in which the worker was expected to earn minimum wage, it was not reasonable to expect the worker to commute for at least two and one-half hours per day or to relocate from a community where he has been living for 35 years.
The worker was entitled to full LOE benefits. The appeal was allowed.